What the Politicians say
The attached articles and motions show some of the excellent work which is being conducted on behalf of Hills Residents in a bid to make AirServices Australia become more accountable for their actions.
Senate to probe aircraft noise
In Saturday's Hills Gazette (28 Nov 09) on page 3 there is an article
by
Louise Bettison titled "Senate to probe aircraft noise" You can
view the article here:
http://hills.inmycommunity.com.au/news-and-views/local-news/Senate-to-probe-aircraft-noise/7542601/
The inquiry will be national and there will be a chance for interested
people to make submissions by 29th Jan 2010.
Senate debates
Wednesday, 25 November 2009
Committees
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
Senator BACK (WA, Liberal Party) (3.45 pm)—I move:
That:
(1) The following matter be referred to the Rural and Regional Affairs
and Transport References Committee for inquiry and report by 1 June
2010: An assessment of the effectiveness of Airservices
Australia’s management of aircraft noise under its responsibilities to
provide air traffic services and protect the environment from the
effects associated with the operation of aircraft for which it has
legislative jurisdiction.
(2) In undertaking this inquiry, the committee shall consider
whether Airservices Australia:
(a) has conducted an effective, open and informed public
consultation strategy with communities affected by aircraft noise;
(b) engages with industry and business stakeholders in an
open, informed and reasonable way;
(c) has adequate triggers for public consultation under
legislation and whether procedures used by Airservices Australia are
compliant with these requirements;
(d) is accountable, as a government-owned corporation, for
the conduct of its noise management strategy;
(e) has pursued and established equitable noise-sharing
arrangements in meeting its responsibilities to provide air traffic
services and to protect the environment from the effects associated
with aircraft for which it is responsible;
(f) requires a binding Community Consultation Charter to
assist it in consulting fully and openly with communities affected by
aircraft noise; and
(g) any other related matter.
Senator LUDWIG (Queensland—Manager of Government Business in
the Senate) (3.45 pm)
by leave—The government opposes this motion by Senator Back because not
only is it poorly conceived but in addition Airservices Australia has a
legal requirement to place safety as its most important consideration
and any assessment of Airservices performance with regard to managing
aircraft noise needs to be included within this context.
The primacy of safety is established in Airservices legislation and has
always been the key expectation held by members of the public when they
fly. Subject to safety being the most important consideration,
Airservices has a second legal obligation to protect the environment
from the impact of aviation as far as is practicable. This
responsibility is undertaken in conjunction with requirements above the
legislation such as the Environment Protection and Biodiversity
Conservation Act 1999. However, there is no requirement for Airservices
to have or implement a formalised national noise management strategy as
the motion assumes nor does any such strategy exist.
Traditionally and consistent with legislation and ministerial
requirements, Airservices provides a national noise complaints service
and works through established airport community forums to provide
information on aircraft noise issues at a local level. Also as a
guiding principle Airservices, wherever possible, does attempt to
minimise aircraft noise impacts and distribute them equitably.
Consultation by the aviation industry and government agencies is being
addressed in the aviation white paper, which is scheduled to be
released before the end of this year. This matter and the needs of the
community are therefore already being addressed at the national level
by this government.
Question agreed to.
Senator O’BRIEN (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party) (3:47 pm)
by leave—The government opposes this motion. As has just been said we
recognise that the support of the Greens for the coalition motion gives
it a majority. We will not be seeking to divide.